Wikipedia:Peer review/Ford Taurus/archive2

Ford Taurus
see also: Peer review/Ford Taurus/archive1

I tried to get it to featured status, but it failed again. I fixed many of the people's objections, mostly by removing a section that was all POV. Now I am hoping I gould get this article to featured status, but I want your openions before I resubmit it. --Karrmann


 * (Here is the prior FA review: Ford_Taurus.) I think this article has serious PoV issues, beginning with the second paragraph. Sections reads like they were copied out of an advertizing brocure. Any sentence that has a non-neutral flavor needs to have a citation from a neutral source to back it up, or suitable neutral wording. In its current form I don't think I would seriously consider this an encyclopedic article. Sorry. What is the "Five Hundred" and why isn't it linked? &mdash; RJH 15:53, 2 May 2006 (UTC)