Wikipedia:Peer review/Foundation series/archive1

Foundation series

 * Article (Edit|History) • Article talk (Edit|History) • Watch article • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion has been closed. I've listed this article for peer review it is a former FA demoted because of lack of references. I want to solve this issue, but I would like to know weather there are any other issues (besides referencing) that could pose a problem. Thanks, Nergaal (talk) 09:17, 31 January 2008 (UTC)


 * A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style. If you would find such a review helpful, please click here. Thanks, APR t 15:59, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Deciding on the proposed merger would definitely help. The article would definitely benefit from a bit more content regarding critical reaction to the series as a whole, probably particularly to the original Trilogy. It would probably help if there were a bit more content relating to the development of the series, even if only in an abbreviated form. Other than that, any additional relevant content from the sources, as they're found, is about all I can imagine it might need. John Carter (talk) 21:43, 31 January 2008 (UTC)


 * The lead needs to be better developed per WP:LEAD. Majoreditor (talk) 18:13, 1 February 2008 (UTC)