Wikipedia:Peer review/Fred Newman/archive1

Fred Newman
Peer review requested, as this article is in danger of becoming a battleground between supporters and detractors of the article's susbject.BabyDweezil 17:11, 19 September 2006 (UTC)


 * The first, most obvious improvement that could be made is adequate sourcing. Read through Cite sources, and apply. This would improve the article a lot, and quell some disagreement as well. – Quadell (talk) (random) 17:16, 19 September 2006 (UTC)


 * See WP:LEAD, WP:MOS, WP:GTL, and a sample philosophy article, Hilary Putnam. This article currently is uncited, and has no structure. The lead should be about 3 paragraphs, summarizing the rest of the article, and everything should be referenced.  Sandy 20:37, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

Thanks both for your imput and suggestions. The Putnam entry seems an excellent model to use. The Newman entry clearly needs to be begun again from scratch, on that sort of model. Current version seems strcutured only as a template for the author to be able to present the subject in the most unflattering light.BabyDweezil 14:23, 20 September 2006 (UTC)