Wikipedia:Peer review/Funeral for Yesterday/archive4

Funeral for Yesterday


I've listed this article for peer review because... Trying to get it to GA/FA status (i messed up the peer review so i have to redo it) Look for:
 * Does it read fairly and unbiased?
 * Is the structure of the page good or bad?
 * Is the recording/production read okay?
 * Any typos and errors?
 * Any further things that need to be pointed out?

Thanks, Chchcheckit (talk) 12:09, 21 June 2023 (UTC)


 * A few notes:
 * I don't see any NPOV issues.
 * Layout looks good.
 * As far as GACR goes, the article appears to be sufficiently broad in scope and in depth.
 * From a cursory look, the sourcing looks fine.
 * I recommend giving the article another copy edit and then requesting a copy edit at GOCER before nominating this for GA/FA.
 * The free use rationale for the audio snippet could be a bit more detailed.
 * There appears to be a bit over overlinking going on (e.g., cease and desist, retainer agreement, and groping).
 * voorts (talk/contributions) 00:42, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
 * thank you. Chchcheckit (talk) 12:37, 10 July 2023 (UTC)