Wikipedia:Peer review/Gender roles in Islam/archive1

Gender roles in Islam
The article as is stands, with the exception of the first paragraph (Background) to which I helped, is almost entriely original research. The Source given to back up statements in fact state the opposite. For example the source given to back up the statement: "Obviously this is a vision of Heaven that is more likely to appeal to men. Eternally virgin dark-eyed Houris are unlikely to appeal to many women" actually says "The life of women in Jannah will be as pleasant and happy as the life of men. Allah is not partial to any gender. He created both of them and He will take care of both of them according to their needs and desires. Let us all work to achieve the Jannah and then, in sha’ Allah, we will find there what will satisfy all of us fully." - It needs to be severly NPOVed to boot. It ignores the "Science of hadith" and selectively picks Hadees that suits the cause, ignores the isnad and context, and suggests that that is all the source that is needed. Help Needed here badly! --Irishpunktom\talk 15:52, August 29, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete - reminds me of a very long answer to an RE exam question. Wikipedia is not a place for original research. Rob Church Talk 15:54, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
 * I suggest it is taken off WP:PR until the VfD has run it's course.WegianWarrior
 * I aggree with Wegian. This should be de-Peer Reviewed while the VfD runs its course.  --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> - 22:47, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Peer review is not a suitable place for posting problem articles. Please try Pages needing attention in future. Thanks. &mdash; RJH 14:57, 30 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Archived Early per Wikipedia guidlines and concensus above