Wikipedia:Peer review/General Ignorance/archive1

General Ignorance
I think what is the main area that may need to be improved is reviews of the book. However, I'm not sure which bits of the article truly need improving. ISD 15:12, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Some points:
 * Is it really a parody? Just because an obvious answer is incorrect that doesn't mean that it isn't still just a general knowledge quiz, just a harder one.
 * Is it the most famous? Can we have a citation for this if it is.
 * Make it clear in the intro whether you are talking about the book or the part of the TV show.
 * Alan Davies' scores before and after one particular round of this surely are more detail than is needed.
 * Does a round in a quiz show really need an article anyway? I would have thought that the QI article could cover this sufficiently. I would rewrite the article to be about the books as these are sufficiently different to warrant their own article. JMiall  ₰  11:00, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
 * I've took what you have said into account and have now made the article about the book. The article is now about The Book of General Ignorance.