Wikipedia:Peer review/Genesis I (module)/archive1

Genesis I (module)
I've recently completely rewritten this article (along with Genesis II (module), which I intend to submit for review at a later date, and Sundancer) and feel it may be acceptable as a Good Article (certainly too short for FA). Everything is fairly stable, decently sourced, etc; I like it, but extra eyes can only make it better. Any and all feedback is appreciated. -- Huntster  T • @ • C 11:12, 14 August 2007 (UTC)


 * I think you should have the year in the lead. Also, I would prefer that these be Genesis I and Genesis II, and the movie be moved to Genesis II (film). &larr;BenB4 11:30, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
 * As in 'launched in 2006' or similar? That should be easy enough.  My reasoning for the article titles, however, is the conflict with the books of Genesis in the Christian Bible.  It is something I've been tossing around in my skull for some time, that the "Genesis 1"/"Genesis I" current redirects should point to Genesis rather than this article, given that they are likely going to have higher intended traffic.  For now, I'd like to see what others think, but it is certainly something that needs to be taken care of, one way or the other. --  Huntster  T • @ • C 11:40, 14 August 2007 (UTC)