Wikipedia:Peer review/Geology of the Grand Canyon area/archive1

Geology of the Grand Canyon area
I've wrote pretty much the whole thing and am now working on History of the Grand Canyon area offline. I'd like to put this through FAC. So far I plan to expand the lead section a bit and add photos. What else can be done to make this article a good FAC? --mav 02:51, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * It looks pretty good to me overall, although I'm not versed in the Geology. There are, perhaps, a few too many dead links in the text. Perhaps the important ones can be added to the requests for pages, or redirected to existing content? &mdash; RJH 17:05, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * I'll see about creating some stubs for those. (I remember a time when it was common for over half the links in an article to be dead...) --mav 22:56, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Many of the red links now taken care of. --mav 04:33, 16 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * A lot of interesting information here. Minor suggestions for improvement - the image at the top does not look very good as currently presented, it doesn't really invite the reader to scroll past it for the rest of the article.  I think it would look better right-justified and smaller.  The intro is currently a big chunk of text, it might look better split into some paragraphs.  I'm also curious as to why each stratum was named as it was, and I think the explanation of what unconformities and noncomformities are and the distinction between them could be made clearer.  Are they in fact distinct concepts? Worldtraveller 11:16, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Image fixed lead now 3 paras. There are parenthetical explanations of the different kinds of unconformities along with links to unconformity. I don't have a source that gives the origin of the different names. --mav 04:33, 16 Apr 2005 (UTC)