Wikipedia:Peer review/Godzilla Minus One/archive1

Godzilla Minus One


Over the last few months, I've been putting a lot of time and effort into making this page well-written and worthy of GA or even FA status since the movie has become so popular and has been a historical success at the Oscars. I would appreciate any comments on what still needs to be sorted out so I can move forward, thanks. - Eiga-Kevin2 (talk) 23:07, 11 March 2024 (UTC)

Comments from Z1720
Comments after a quick skim:


 * I believe the first paragraph in "U.S. performance" is too long. This should be split into two, and the last paragraph merged into the second paragraph.
 * Much of your reception sections fall into the "X said Y" pattern and use direct quotes. I suggest reading WP:RECEPTION and rework these sections.
 * The "Critical reception" section is too long. I suggest trimming or splitting this section.
 * Some of the references have titles in all caps. Per MOS:ALLCAPS this should be changed to sentence case.
 * Refs 138, 151, 169 & 201: Per WP:FORBESCON this is considered an unreliable source.

Those are my thoughts. Z1720 (talk) 19:51, 15 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Thank you for your comments. I'll be fixing these issues over the next few days. Eiga-Kevin2 (talk) 04:49, 16 March 2024 (UTC)

Comments from Writehydra
After a skim:
 * Saw some redlinks; may need separate article creations if notable (these redlinks had Japanese articles already written, could translate)

And that's all. Seems like a GA could be happening in a soon future. Writehydra (talk) 05:49, 29 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Thanks. I'll give those redlinks articles and then proceed to get this page to GA. Eiga-Kevin2 (talk) 05:51, 2 April 2024 (UTC)