Wikipedia:Peer review/Google/archive3

Google
previous PR

Yes, I know this has been peer reviewed before. However, the article's changed a lot since it was last reviewed, and I feel that it would benefit from another peer review.

Thanks,

⁮şœśэїŝәқιￆṱᾅἻқￂ 05:00, 5 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Please see automated peer review suggestions here. Thanks, APR t 13:30, 6 October 2007 (UTC)

First Impressions:

Section Issues:
 * The "Environmental record" title sounds a little POV and the section is too short. Maybe that section and Google.org" can be worked into a more general section to balance out the "Criticism" part.
 * The "Criticism" part is a pretty good length. I would say tad bit more on the censorship part, though.
 * The "Google.mobi" section I would move under the "Growth" section.
 * More main headers (too much under "History" - "Growth" may work)

Contrent:
 * Needs more about the search engine. I know it has it's own page, but that's mainly what the company's know for.
 * Needs more on AdSense/AdWords and the advertising side in general.
 * Something should be said about Google's partnership with Mozilla.
 * Google video - YouTube connection?
 * A few more images in the middle would be nice.
 * No reason is given for "Another trademark concern is about Google's Gmail in the UK and several other countries."

Style:
 * Inconsistent formats "USD100,000" and "$1.67 billion"
 * IPO is used a few times before it's linked, some might not know what that is
 * "Acquisitions" needs to flow better - not so choppy.

- Rocket000 12:43, 7 October 2007 (UTC)