Wikipedia:Peer review/Grade I listed buildings in Greater Manchester/archive1

Grade I listed buildings in Greater Manchester
I want to get a more thorough review by peer review for a list that I want to nominate at FLC sometime soon. All ideas welcome. Rt . 21:50, 17 December 2007 (UTC) Hope this helps. Oldelpaso (talk) 18:36, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
 * ✅Why are the table headers in a blueish colour?
 * - Changed to black (#000000) in line with other lists with similar tables. Rt . 19:10, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
 * ✅Is there a particular reason why the former Bank of England is not linked?
 * - The article doesn't exist. Perhaps a creation needed? Rt . 19:10, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Nothing wrong with it being a redlink if it doesn't yet exist but is notable enough for an article. Oldelpaso (talk) 23:07, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
 * The location column does not give much insight to someone unfamiliar with the city. Perhaps a map indicating the location of each building would be a useful addition.
 * In spite of Manchester's medieval history - not sure about this phrase. It provokes the question "what medieval history, and why is it important"?
 * This may be due to my personal preferences for this type of article, but I think a longer prose section would be beneficial. Something like a paragraph which briefly explains what each building is, so the reader does not have to go to each building's article to find out.
 * [[Image:Symbol question.svg|16px]] How would that be written? It would be hard to write about everything, but at the same time, trying to prevent it from being too long. Rt . 19:12, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Going completely off the top of my head here, but a starter might be "The oldest listed building in the city is Manchester Cathedral. Completed in 1421, it is one of three Grade I listed religious buildings in Manchester..." Presumably construction of the commercial buildings in the list (Liverpool Rd Station, former Bank of England) coincided with a period of prosperity. In essence, the themes from the second paragraph could be integrated with information about some of the items in the list. As I say, this may be a matter of personal taste, I like list articles with meaty prose sections.
 * Another thing I've noticed - none of the buildings in the list are Edwardian seeing as the most recent is 1899. Oldelpaso (talk) 23:07, 18 December 2007 (UTC)


 * A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style. If you would find such a review helpful, please click here. Thanks, APR t 01:24, 19 December 2007 (UTC)