Wikipedia:Peer review/Grammy Award for Best Soul Gospel Performance, Male or Female/archive1

Grammy Award for Best Soul Gospel Performance, Male or Female
This peer review discussion has been closed. I've listed this article for peer review because I would appreciate feedback prior to nominating the article for GA status. One major concern is the length of the article. Enough detail? Too much detail for an award that was only presented once? Any feedback about the article would be appreciated. Much thanks! -- Another Believer ( Talk ) 02:34, 25 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments by Dana Boomer

Overall looks good. A few comments:


 * Lead. In general, the lead is not supposed to introduce information that is not present in the body of the article. Currently, the entire first paragraph of the lead focuses on the background of the Grammy Awards, and this information is not repeated in the body of the article. IMO, the majority of the information in the first paragraph of the lead could be moved to the Background section, with just a summary remaining. Combine all of the background info (on both the Grammys as a whole and just this award) into the first paragraph, and then use the second paragraph to better summarize the Awards section. Currently the lead gives almost no summary of the Awards section, while giving almost all of the information that will later be presented in the Background section (and more), rather than providing just a summary.
 * I appreciated your feedback. Currently, the lead is consistent with all of the other FL/GA Grammy-related articles, though I do understand where you are coming from. I think I will leave the lead as is for now, but I would not object to making changes should consensus at GAN show a similar preference. -- Another Believer ( Talk ) 17:27, 6 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Lead and Background, "both of which lasted until the 53rd Grammy Awards in 2011." They were discontinued in 2011?
 * Correct. The "Full Category List" reference verifies its disestablishment. -- Another Believer ( Talk ) 17:27, 6 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Award - Were Daniel and Vickie Winans related?
 * Yes. I included a link to the Winans family article. -- Another Believer ( Talk ) 17:27, 6 June 2011 (UTC)

I know the above are not a lot of comments, but I hope they're helpful. In response to your specific question (length/detail), I can't think of anything that has been left out of the article, and I also don't think there's too much detail. The references and images look good. Overall, I think this would make a nice little GA, although you may have some issues at FAC because it's so short (although it does seem comprehensive, so I could be wrong). Please let me know if you have any comments or questions, Dana boomer (talk) 18:38, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Thank you for taking the time to offer comments and suggestions. Much appreciated! -- Another Believer ( Talk ) 17:27, 6 June 2011 (UTC)