Wikipedia:Peer review/Greater Scaup/archive1

Greater Scaup
This peer review discussion has been closed. I've listed this article for peer review because I have been expanding upon it since October. It started out as a stub and is now a sizable article, complete with pictures and a range map. I feel that I have gotten the article as far as I can without an offical peer review.

Thanks, --Haydenowensrulz (talk) 13:02, 5 December 2011 (UTC)

Comments
 * The wikilinks Newfoundland, Sterile and America are ambigious. Link them more specifically per MOS:DAB
 * Capitalisation of scraup is inconsistant, not sure which is correct but not both upper and lowercase. 'so that if the Scaup is killed by a hunter', 'Since the 1980s, scaup populations', 'rafts of scaup that can number in the thousands'
 * The last external link 'Greater and Lesser Scaups, Environment Canada' appears to be dead, remove or replace it.
 * Fossils, a search on google scholar(http://scholar.google.com) shows some fossil information for 'Aythya marila fossil' is available. It would seem appropriate to mention a fossil timeframe. http://141.213.232.243/bitstream/2027.42/48486/2/ID336.pdf page 214 says recorded from  the Pleistocene. So the appropriate  can be added to the ; parameter is called fossil_range if I recall correctly
 * units metric/imperial. In the description it's metric first '39–56 cm (15–22 in)' in the feeding section it's reversed. ' 20 feet (6 m)'. I think it's suppose to be metric first as this is international topic
 * Regards, SunCreator (talk) 23:53, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Map is unsourced.
 * Use of Male/Drake and Hen/female, aren't they the same? Regards, SunCreator (talk) 13:43, 7 December 2011 (UTC)