Wikipedia:Peer review/Greenwich/archive1

Greenwich
I've listed this article for peer review because… in common with much of London, this is a sub-division of a sub-division. It's certainly important and has its own history. There are large elements of the How to write about Geo that are better dealt with the higher political unit (London Borough level). I'd be interested in editors' viewpoints on what should and should not be included in an article at this level, and what is needed to move this article forward.

Thank you,

Kbthompson (talk) 17:53, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment immediate things that occur to me from WP:UKCITIES is that distances from the centre of London should be included, and that notable people should not be presented as lists. The history section is referenced, but there are few throughout the rest of the article. Kbthompson (talk) 18:25, 28 November 2007 (UTC)


 * I would probably say that the education section could be expanded and the transport section either expanded with a lead or condensed. Also note that not all of the references are actually references, just notes on the areas, so check these. Maybe use more. And obviously refernce more generally. Simply south (talk) 19:13, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks for that, I'll take a deeper look when I have more time. Kbthompson (talk) 10:45, 29 November 2007 (UTC)


 * A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style. If you would find such a review helpful, please click here. Thanks, APR t 02:46, 29 November 2007 (UTC)