Wikipedia:Peer review/Guillermo Vargas/archive1

Guillermo Vargas
This peer review discussion has been closed. I've listed this article for peer review because… The subject is widely reported in blogs and you tube. It is not listed as a hoax or urban legend any where. So the references are not normally acceptable. However, there are enough of them. If it is true, the WP should include it. With a million signature petition against the artist, if it is not true then it is certain a notable phenomenon. Your honoured opinions please.

Thanks, Triwbe (talk) 18:04, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Ruhrfisch comments: Peer review is not really for notability debates - if the Guardian writes about him, he seems notable to me. Here are some suggestions for improvement: Hope this helps, the article is very short so not much else to comment on Ruhrfisch &gt;&lt;&gt; &deg; &deg; 15:19, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Make sure the lead summarizes the article per WP:LEAD
 * References need to be complete, consider using cite web and cite news and include url, title, publisher, author if known and date accessed for internet sources.
 * try to expand the article
 * Any chance of an image?