Wikipedia:Peer review/Guster/archive1

Guster
How can this article become better? What does it need, not need, or what should be expanded? -  hmwith  talk   17:44, 30 April 2007 (UTC)


 * After a quick look, here are some suggestions:
 * Expand the lead - see appropriate MOS guidelines about what it should look like.
 * Separate the discography section into its own article.
 * Lots of refs for both Style and Fan reception sections. Both need to be approached with RSs as both can get pretty POV if you're not careful, as well as getting kind of OR-ish. Cite all awards received.
 * Remove the Tufts image. Not relevant enough to need to see what the university looked like.
 * Kill the trivia section or incorporate it into the article. If you can't find a ref for each trivia bullet point then you should remove it.
 * Read over WP:EL and remove cruft links. The fan page and the 'gusterography' both seem like ones that should be tossed.
 * Thats about it for now. For everyone's sake respond directly to comments here, but tap me on the shoulder about it on my talk page if you need me to comment further. JoeSmack Talk 17:11, 1 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Alright, I think I took care of most of the main issues, except for the Style & Fan reception sections, which will need a bit of time through which to sort, so I'll have to wait until I have more time to spend on the article. If you or anyone has any further tips, let us know! -  hmwith  talk   10:36, 3 May 2007 (UTC)


 * One thing I noticed, as JoeSmack Talk noticed as well, is the lack of references. But even more than just in Style and Fan reception, it was in the whole article. Something that is more of a personal opinion is the eveness of the pictures (they are all on the right). It might give it a better feel if you change some of the pictures to the left. Other than that it is a great article! Acidskater 05:50, 4 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Please see automated peer review suggestions here. Thanks, Ruhrfisch 03:04, 8 May 2007 (UTC)