Wikipedia:Peer review/Hatoful Boyfriend/archive1

Hatoful Boyfriend
This peer review discussion has been closed. I stumbled across this article a couple weeks ago. And I must say that I am impressed about its current condition. Looks to reach GA status with a few tweaks here and there. Hopefully this Peer Review can help step it in the right direction.

Cheers, GamerPro64  21:46, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

*Smash Bros. intro-style* Tezero Zeroes In!
Alright, here I am. Normally I wouldn't consider PR necessary for GAN except for subjects one is new to editing or when one is a new editor, but since you're already here: Tezero (talk) 17:31, 27 September 2014 (UTC)
 * I can't actually tell what Bad Boys' Love is. Is it just a different story route you can select at the beginning of the game? An expansion? Peripheral materials?
 * Mentioned that it was a bonus storyline. Might as to expand on that fact more in the article. GamerPro64  03:17, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
 * "Although Hatoful received much attention for its premise and surreal humor" - why is this apart from the other reception in the lead?
 * Removed it from the lead it wasn't exactly that important. GamerPro64  03:17, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
 * The Plot section seems to be on the long side. This is okay if it's just a long game, but be warned that you may be called out for this. The standard length for video game plot sections is about half to two-thirds of this, and you may be held to that standard.
 * "The series is released in visual novel format on the Adobe AIR platform, and takes place in a different universe than the game series." - source?
 * Why is there a table for one volume of the manga?
 * "ahead of Borderlands 2, succeeding 2011's The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim and followed by 2013's BioShock Infinite" - ambiguous as to the ordering
 * There's a cite error on the citation "Dora".
 * Which citation is that? GamerPro64  03:17, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
 * It's been fixed now; looks to have been caused by list-defined refs. (I really don't see why those are such an improvement if they cause very visible errors when the references are not used in-text.) Tezero (talk) 03:39, 29 September 2014 (UTC)