Wikipedia:Peer review/History of Raëlism/archive1

History of Raëlism

 * I would like to get an assessment on this article. Thank you!Kmarinas86 19:27, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

User:IvoShandor
I will try to review the prose later, it would help if you could convert it from lists first. : )

A quick review:
 * Lists: Way way too listy, convert all lists to prose.
 * DoneKmarinas86 07:36, 18 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Sub-sections:
 * Too many sections, combine them, no need for a section for every year.
 * DoneKmarinas86 07:36, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Try to use more descriptive section titles, such as 'Founding' or 'Early years,' or something of the ilk, when you combine and retitle them.
 * DoneKmarinas86 07:36, 18 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Intro: The intro should conform to WP:LEAD and, also, not include any lists.
 * DoneKmarinas86 07:36, 18 March 2007 (UTC)


 * MOS: Read and understand the Manual of Style
 * DoneKmarinas86 07:36, 18 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Pronunciation:Might need a pronunciation for this subject.
 * OkKmarinas86 07:36, 18 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Images:
 * This image: Image:Betty Dodson hugging one of her friends.jpg, is a vanity photo and unencyclopedic.
 * Same with: Image:Raelian Women and Hugh Hefner.jpg.
 * OkKmarinas86 07:36, 18 March 2007 (UTC)


 * References:I would separate the bibliographic lists from the footnotes.
 * DoneKmarinas86 07:36, 18 March 2007 (UTC)


 * External links: The external links section is beginning to look like a link directory, See WP:NOT. Try to trim it down to the most pertinent links that are on topic, just the history, the other stuff probably belongs linked from other articles.
 * RemovedKmarinas86 07:36, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Criticism links (unless the criticize the history), unofficial websites, sexuality (unless they directly discuss it related to the movement's history) - should probably all go.
 * Trim the rest down, too many official links too. Try to find the best history ones, and maybe one or two that might act as directories of the official stuff and try linking that.


 * Content: Like I said I will comment more later, but at a glance, try to remember that not every event is notable in the movement's overall history (which is what this article should remain focused on).
 * OkKmarinas86 07:36, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

Hope that helps for now, as I said, if you could convert it to prose I could do a much broader assessment.IvoShandor 05:53, 9 March 2007 (UTC)