Wikipedia:Peer review/History of the Internet/archive2

History of the Internet
With NPOV dispute issues setled, a re-write of this article was made to bring it up to a good standard of readability and content. Hopefully I would like to bring this up to a level acceptable for a Featured status article.

The article currently deals with an Infrastructure and Use view of the Internet's history. And I have attempted to research information on the spread of internet use outside the US and Europe. --Barberio 16:19, 26 December 2005 (UTC)

Previous Peer Review

My comments:
 * 1) Expand the lead to two paragraphs (see WP:Lead for tips).
 * Will be added. --Barberio 15:00, 27 December 2005 (UTC)


 * 1) Add an external links section
 * Very few external links that have not been more suitable as Citeations. --Barberio 15:00, 27 December 2005 (UTC)


 * 1) See also section?
 * Will be added. --Barberio 15:00, 27 December 2005 (UTC)


 * 1) The main header titles should include timeline dates in them
 * See below comment. This history explicitly can not be represented as a linear timeline due to a branching context issue. --Barberio 15:00, 27 December 2005 (UTC)


 * 1) The red links should be addressed by creating those articles as stubs.
 * 2) I think there are too many subsections - maybe merge some together?
 * Disagree substantialy here. A major flaw of the previous version of the article was an unclear structure. Since the history here has a branching and multitrack nature, there is going to be sunstantial 'jumping back and forth' in a time line. Meaning that there needs to be clear subsectioning to make sure the reader does not become confused. --Barberio 15:00, 27 December 2005 (UTC)


 * 1) More pictures would be good.
 * 2) The article is generally pretty brief - more detail would be nice, how about a mention of Amazon and eBay and how they've affected the WWW/Internet.
 * Since the article is already pushing 32K, I've chosen to keep to breif summary style. --Barberio 15:00, 27 December 2005 (UTC)

— Wackymacs 01:32, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
 * 1) Maybe this article should mention the hardware side of the internet too? Servers, etc


 * Key concepts should be briefly explained even if they have an article of their own. What is ARPA? What is packet switching? The reader will have to know these in order to understand the article. For instance, it is written later on the article: "Eventually, in July 1975, the network had been turned over to the Defense Communications Agency, also part of the Department of Defense". But it was never stated that ARPA was part of the Dept. of Defense to begin with.
 * Nowhere is it stated that ARPA and ARPANET were USA-based projects. It may seem obvious to the authors, but it may not be to the readers.
 * Correct, as with the DOD/ARPA link, this was a sloppy assumption. Both will be fixed. --Barberio 15:00, 27 December 2005 (UTC)


 * The technical aspects seem to be well covered, but the historical bits are lacking. What was the influence, if any, of the Cold War? How did the USA military participated in it? Is the Internet an American invention?
 * There is no indication from any of my research that the Cold War played much part in the push for internet research, other than in the general way computing as a whole was pushed. Making any claim as to who invented 'The Internet' would be so hazy a dispute as to be inherently POV since there is no single point at which 'The Internet' had been invented. It was, as mentioned in the summary, a melting pot development. --Barberio 15:00, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
 * I confess I don't really remember what I was thinking when I wrote that "Is the Internet an American invention?" thing, which sounds like a dumb question right now. :) As for the Cold War, I think this is related to the nuclear attack thing. I remember having read in magazines that the Internet was created because of the Cold War. I will try to come up with some reference for this, and if I find it I'll post it to the article's talk page. JoaoRicardotalk 20:19, 27 December 2005 (UTC)


 * The idea that the Internet was created to withstand nuclear attack is a strong one in pop culture, mentioned in magazines and TV shows. It is fine to show that this is a myth, but you should have a very good source for this claim. It should also be expanded, maybe getting its own subsection.
 * I'll look for a suitable cite. However, there really isnt much more to this than 'Rand did some battle damage testing'. --Barberio 15:00, 27 December 2005 (UTC)


 * "This caused controversy amongst university users, who were outraged at the idea of noneducational use of their networks." It would be nice having a source for this.
 * Comercial use controversy is mentioned in the previously made Tanenbaum cite. --Barberio 15:00, 27 December 2005 (UTC)

JoaoRicardotalk 06:09, 27 December 2005 (UTC)


 * Overall, the article is good. I made a few minor spelling/grammatical changes here and there, nothing major. The article is lacking a few important things: First, there is no mention of Internet2. A brief mention and a link to the Internet2 article would probably be a good idea. Secondly, it could help to add some of the more recent ICANN developments regarding the additional domain names (.biz, .museum, .aero, etc), and possibly even a mention of the debate to try and get a .xxx domain approved. Perhaps have a link in a 'See also' section to a List of Internet top-level domains and a Country code top-level domain. The article should also probably mention some of the more recent concerns by several other countries regarding US ownership of the root DNS servers. Dr. Cash 17:01, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
 * While Internet2 is a large network consortium, it's not had as significant impact on global internet history as NSFNet, or CERN did. ICANN's own history and debates should probably go in ICANN's own article, not this one. Recent concerns over US control are probably too recent to put on a history page. --Barberio 05:32, 9 January 2006 (UTC)

Dubious over a see also section. As we already have a 'History of Computing' infor box, and many main article links. See also may be over kill? --Barberio 16:31, 14 January 2006 (UTC)

Will be added/changed
See also section

--Barberio 15:00, 27 December 2005 (UTC)

Done
Explicitly state ARPA and ARPANET were USA-based Department of Defence projects

Expand the lead to two paragraphs (see WP:Lead for tips).

--Barberio 05:18, 9 January 2006 (UTC)

Suitable 'Nuclear Atack' Cite. Reworded statement to clarify.

--Barberio 16:31, 14 January 2006 (UTC)