Wikipedia:Peer review/Intensive short-term dynamic psychotherapy/archive1

Intensive short-term dynamic psychotherapy
Review is requested from two sorts of individuals. First, those with expertise in psychodynamic psychotherapies, to make sure I have fairly and accurately used technical terminology. Second, those with a general interest in high quality rhetoric and prose, to make sure I have written well and am neither too prolix, nor too jargon-laden.

I thank all those who take an interest in these matters, and all comments will be carefully considered.

--Robert Tarzwell 03:15, 26 November 2005 (UTC)

Nice article. Clear description of technique and purposes.
 * Get rid of red links. I fixed some links, and there might be a few more that could be improved. Look for red links and either try other variants (like I did for a couple of your red links) or write a brief definitional stub.
 * If you are going to link names that you think deserve an article, link full names even if you just want the last names in the text.
 * Make the relationship of isdp and cog-behav therapy clearer. Is this a type of cog-beh or are they alternative systems? If cog-beh is the current standard, what are the principal differences? alteripse 12:46, 29 November 2005 (UTC)

Thanks for your feedback! I have replied in more detail on your talk page. All your suggested edits have been incorporated, and I believe they were right on the money. --Robert Tarzwell 18:43, 1 December 2005 (UTC)