Wikipedia:Peer review/International Court of Justice advisory opinion on Kosovo's declaration of independence/archive1

===International Court of Justice advisory opinion on Kosovo's declaration of independence=== This peer review discussion has been closed. I've listed this article for peer review because…editors have left notes on the talk page of how beneficial the article was in informing on the matter at hand and also the "article is the most comprehensive that I've ever seen."

We've split off the page so as to not make it too long and unreadable, some formatting and tables made it easier to read and process the information. I was wondering what someone might need to know what is not answered and to make it more comprehensible so as to eventually be a FA. Anything that would help in making the article free (or close enough) of deficiencies, on particular sectional organisation and/or contradictions.

Thanks, Lihaas (talk) 12:35, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

Comments by an odd name --an odd name 05:51, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
 * No dab links, but external links for refs 13 and 86 are down or dead.
 * The gigantic reactions table was split off—yay—but I think the public hearings one should go too. You say you want this to be a FA at some point, so remember criterion 4, and ask yourself if comments by (for example) Burundi, Jordan, and Vietnam really aren't "unnecessary detail".
 * Watch the citation formats (2c):
 * Refs 1 through 70 mostly use ISO-style YYYY-MM-DD, but suddenly veer off to Day Month Year after.
 * Try not to mix, , and hand-typed citations if possible.
 * Clothe the bare URLs. You don't want some naughty PDF link running around and showing its colons and slashes to everyone, without so much as a publisher or access date on hand in case they die and we want to reminisce...oh, the horror!