Wikipedia:Peer review/Jello Biafra/archive1

Jello Biafra
I've tried to get this one chosen as a featured article before, and it hasn't managed to earn that status yet. I believe I've expended all the knowledge I have on the subject, so I'm going to just leave it to peer reviewers to finish the job. -- LGagnon 02:49, Apr 4, 2005 (UTC)
 * LGagnon, it looks from the Talk:Jello Biafra History as if there's been a bit of a revert war between you and violet/riga about having the and/or the  templates on the page. I don't understand what that's about, maybe you could explain (assuming it's relevant to getting the article to FA status)? And could you put the  tag back, please, unless there's some special point in not having it? The purpose of it is to prominently display a link to the earlier FAC discussion, which is surely a useful thing for people who want to improve the article. To make the job you're asking the peer reviewers to do easier, we might as well have the old FAC vote link right here, too, here it is. Bishonen|Talk 19:07, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)


 * The previous revert was because the candidate status was removed prematurely the first time. I later let that go and instead resubmitted it after doing some revision work. After that, it failed again, but this time with a proper amount of time given. As for the tag, I'll put that back; that was deleted somewhat accidentally. -- LGagnon 22:52, Apr 4, 2005 (UTC)
 * I'd say what this needs first is a good copy edit: tighten up the prose. (I made one change myself. Let me know if you want me to take a shot at the whole article this way.) -- Jmabel | Talk 00:19, Apr 5, 2005 (UTC)


 * Ya, that edit is ok. Go ahead and make more changes and we'll see where it goes. -- LGagnon 01:32, Apr 5, 2005 (UTC)