Wikipedia:Peer review/Joe Sakic/archive2

Joe Sakic
Archive from April 17, 2007

This article has been a GA for a while now and after I made a lot of changes to it I kind of left it alone for a while. It's not too far away from FA material I think, but I would like some suggestions as to how to get it on its way there. Sportskido8 15:59, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

hfarmer
The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question. You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, Hfarmer 01:41, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
 * If there is not a free use image in the top right corner of the article, please try to find and include one.[?]
 * Per What is a featured article?, Images should have concise captions.[?]
 * As per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates), dates shouldn't use th; for example, instead of using January 30th was a great day, use January 30 was a great day.[?]
 * Please reorder/rename the last few sections to follow guidelines at Guide to layout.[?]
 * Please make the spelling of English words consistent with either American or British spelling, depending upon the subject of the article. Examples include: honour (B) (American: honor), favorite (A) (British: favourite), favourite (B) (American: favorite), offense (A) (British: offence).
 * Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a.[?]


 * I see that there is a picture in the infobox.


 * The automated peer review is a good guide. If you can set it up in your browser it will help immensely.  Once this review only returns totally irrelevant suggestions the you have probably got a good article. Hfarmer 01:43, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

Serte
Just a few things for now: --Serte [ Talk · Contrib ] 10:54, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
 * You have to check WP:DASH, because it's dead sure that it'll be raised during FLC.
 * The lead should be a summary of the rest of the article. Reading the lead, you see that Sakic has a good wrist shot. So, it'd be expected to have a section or just a few sentences on his style of play in the article. But I found nothing. See Peter Forsberg in his style of play section. (I did it, but still) It has citations from coaches and journalists who said these things about him. I'm sure there will be a good amount of quotes on Sakic's style of play, how he didn't decline with age and such.