Wikipedia:Peer review/John Chrysostom/archive1

John Chrysostom
This article has come a long way in the last few months, including coming through a couple of significant content conflicts. The end result has been a well-cited article. Aware that there are still some things to address (see talk page), I am looking for some suggestions/criticism to help get this article to GA status. -- Pastordavid 21:18, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

Majoreditor
The article is very close to GA status. Some suggestions:


 * Add an image of a Byzantine icon of St. John Chrysostom
 * Add final cites
 * Further description of author's argument in footnote 44 (Wilkin), along with citation of specific pages
 * Some additional information on liturgical contributions and influence. I will help with that over the next three weeks.

CTSWyneken
I believe the article has a good chance of passing GA. The article is much better documented than many I've passed. I'd try to remove the citation needed tags, either by removing the point or finding a source. I'd also take a quick look at the WP:LEAD standard to see if adjustments should be made to the lead. On a style level, I would also try to turn passive into active tense where possible. It makes text easier to read. Having said that, I would likely have passed it. (Having commented on it now, I have to recuse, though. --CTS Wyneken (talk) 20:52, 29 March 2007 (UTC)