Wikipedia:Peer review/Jonathan Blow/archive2

Jonathan Blow


I'd like to bring this article to GAN this year, which will be my first GAN. The article underwent PR in January of this year; it was recommended that it undergoing copy editing. The WP:GUILD copyedited the article last month. I have since added another section. Comments regarding GAN standards / criteria (or otherwise) are greatly appreciated! Neuroxic (talk) 15:21, 24 May 2023 (UTC)

Comments from Z1720
Comments from a quick skim:


 * Everything seems to be cited correctly with inline citations. I think it might be close to, or ready for, a GAN.
 * Ref 47: Per WP:FORBESCON, Forbes contributors are not considered reliable sources on Wikipedia and this should be removed.
 * ✅ Neuroxic (talk) 04:01, 14 June 2023 (UTC)


 * Per MOS:ALLCAPS, titles in references should be in sentence case and not use all caps (eg: refs 55, 57)
 * ✅ Neuroxic (talk) 04:10, 14 June 2023 (UTC)

I hope this helps. Z1720 (talk) 14:49, 5 June 2023 (UTC)


 * Thanks! I didn't know about the distinction between Forbes editors and contributors. I'll see if I can discover whether the Forbes article did manage to find its way into the print edition, but in the meantime I'll try rewriting the sentences which cite it.Neuroxic (talk) 22:46, 13 June 2023 (UTC)

As this is an answered review that has been inactive for a week, I'm closing the review. Neuroxic (talk) 21:45, 20 June 2023 (UTC)