Wikipedia:Peer review/Judgment Day (2005)/archive1

Judgment Day (2005)

 * A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style; it can be found on the automated peer review page for August 2008.
 * A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style; it can be found on the automated peer review page for August 2008.

This peer review discussion has been closed. I've listed this article for peer review because… I want to know what needs to be done, so the article can become an FA.

Thanks, --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 14:33, 25 August 2008 (UTC)

Comments by Gavyn Sykes (talk) 19:01, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Background
 * There must be sentence missing. Why was Mysterio disqualified?
 * How did JBL win the FF4?
 * Scott Garland needed parenthesis.
 * Explain what a Handicap match is.
 * Bad guy > villain, sounds more professional.


 * Preliminary matches
 * Last names can be used after the full ring name is mentioned. Having them there again after the first time is unnecessary clutter.
 * Explain Angle slam.

The rest of it looks fine to me.
 * Done and thank you for the comments. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 19:39, 25 August 2008 (UTC)

Comments from
 * You said you wanted to know what to work on before taking to FAC, so I looked at the sourcing and referencing with that in mind. I reviewed the article's sources as I would at FAC. The sourcing looks good.
 * Hope this helps. Please note that I don't watchlist Peer Reviews I've done. If you have a question about something, you'll have to drop a note on my talk page to get my attention. (My watchlist is already WAY too long, adding peer reviews would make things much worse.) 16:49, 30 August 2008 (UTC)