Wikipedia:Peer review/Juno (film)/archive2

Juno (film)
This peer review discussion has been closed. I've listed this article for peer review because someone suggested that I list it for peer review before jumping into WP:FAC. I think the sections that need the most reviewing are from "Reception" downwards, and the list of references and external links. (The rest seems perfect).
 * Previous peer review

Thanks. --Whoop whoop pull up Bitching Betty 22:38, 23 June 2011 (UTC)

Comments from Wizardman:
 * I didn't see any issues before the Reception section.
 * "Juno grossed US$420,113 over its debut weekend," the US$ part can be delinked and it can just show $, since it was linked in the previous section.
 * Three of the four paragraphs in Juno effect start with 'In [year]...'; mix it up a bit to avoid repetition.
 * "and not some heinous trend brought about by pop culture" " I think that stray quotation is supposed to be a comma
 * "it's time to stop worrying and ask what we can do to help." [97]." remove space between quotation and ref, and take out second period.
 * The block quote needs a citation in the awards section.
 * Not sure why some wins and nominations are cited while others aren't. Shouldn't all of them be?
 * There's no title on Ref #2.
 * Make sure refs are not in all caps (ref #115).
 * I'd remove Facebook as an rs (ref #77).
 * Linking newspapers in the refs on first mention would be nice (Boston Globe, NYT), since you do it for other sites in the refs.
 * There are a few deadlinks that need to be fixed; see here.

I think once these changes are made, it would stand a decent chance at FAC. If you're still not sure you could ask for someone from the Film WikiProject to take a look at it; they may catch things I didn't see. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 21:43, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
 * How do I archive this page? I only know how to archive talk pages. --Whoop whoop pull up Bitching Betty 21:29, 13 July 2011 (UTC)