Wikipedia:Peer review/Kelly Clarkson/archive1

Kelly Clarkson
I'm attempting to remove all of the constant fan-cruft and fan-gush from this article. Improving it to featured standard would definitely halt the daily information that never receives a citation or a verifiable source. Any information is welcome and I will resolve the issues in the article as soon as I make time for it. &mdash;Eternal Equinox | talk 21:34, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Obviously, there need to be more inline citations. I'd also re-incorperate some of discography into the article (maybe just a simple list, similar to the way it's done on Gorillaz). For Concert tours and the Awards and nominations, I would link both under See also, instead of having these subsections with no content. Also, I'm not sure what the current consent on the band infobox is, but I personally find its usage on articles about single musician somewhat improper (especially the field "Origin" seems really strange, I think). And I'm not sure American Idol really qualifies as a "reality-television series". --Fritz Saalfeld (Talk) 12:24, 14 February 2006 (UTC)


 * Improving it to featured standard would definitely halt the daily information that never receives a citation or a verifiable source. Wrong place then. You would want to reducethe article's visibility, not increase it. Circeus 17:30, 14 February 2006 (UTC)


 * See Celine Dion for an example of a FA singer. You're going to need much more critical analysis, including critics in print references (newspapers, magazines, etc.&mdash;all music guide just doesn't cut it), talking about individual songs and albums and how her singing has progressed.  Remove the reference to Wikipedia; that information must have come from somewhere. Inline citations are needed (see Cite/Cite.php).  The three sections at the bottom that have links to separate articles need to summarize the content of those articles (see Summary style). --Spangineer  (háblame)  06:21, 16 February 2006 (UTC)