Wikipedia:Peer review/Kersal Moor/archive1

Kersal Moor
This peer review discussion has been closed. I've listed this article for peer review because WP:GM would like to see this article reach WP:GA status.

Thanks, --Jza84 | Talk  14:42, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

Ruhrfisch comments: Nice article on what looks to be a ver interesting place. Here are some suggestions to help improve it. Hope this helps, Ruhrfisch &gt;&lt;&gt; &deg; &deg; 04:36, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
 * You might want to try using wide image for the panorama, instead of squeezing it into the infobox. Put it at the end maybe? For an example, see Black Moshannon State Park
 * The lead needs to be expanded to summarize the whole article - not much of the history is in the lead or no mention of literary references. See WP:LEAD
 * Units should be both metric and English throughout (now has hectares only for example) The convert template is useful
 * Needs more references - the Geography is not cited after the first sentence, or Waugh's poem is not cited (all direct quotes need refs). See WP:CITE
 * Plants are briefly mentioned in Geography, but there should be more on animals and plants there.
 * The history section especially has several short one or two sentence paragraphs - these should be combined or expanded. The section is also long and could be divided into subsections.
 * Nude Male Races to meet your spouse - too bad this was not in the April Fools DYK!
 * Internet refs need url, title, publisher, author if known, and date accessed. cite web and other cite templates may be useful here
 * No History after 1890?
 * Two poems are quoted in the history - should they be in the Literary refs section?
 * No mention of the Rangers etc. from the lead.
 * Needs at least a locator map within Great Britain, would be great if a more detailed map could be made.