Wikipedia:Peer review/King James Version (album)/archive2

King James Version (album)
I've listed this article for peer review because… several rewrites later from the last peer review, I have made the page MUCH better than it used to be, with better formatting. I need this checking out with regards to; 1. things that don't make sense/grammar? 2. any glaring mistakes 3. any things i should include/mention/say. Aiming for FA/GA status, though it isn't completely there yet.

I am aware that I need to do rewrites of the composition, and the aftermath/legacy section is not complete. Any suggestions on how to do the legacy section will be useful. Thanks, Chchcheckit (talk) 10:39, 4 February 2023 (UTC)