Wikipedia:Peer review/Krrish/archive1

Krrish
This peer review discussion has been closed. I've listed this article for peer review because the article has just recently passed it's Good article status and I think ... with several improving suggestions and hard working on the article, it could actually deserved it's Featured article status. So, if you editors found any mistakes or any suggestions to improve the article, you can write here.

Thanks, World Cinema Writer (talk • contributions) 09:15, 4 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments I believe the article has some catching up to do to retain GA standards and aGA reassessment might be in order.
 * Entire plot summary is unreferenced
 * Ref 1 is to a forum post on Naachgaana; why is this source considered reliable?
 * Refs 4, 7, 8, 10 are to a fan forum; why is it considered reliable?
 * Ref 9 is not a reference, it's a link to the movie's official website, not even to the section where the statement is supposedly mentioned.
 * Ref 11, looks like cinegoer is a user forum as there's nothing at all to mention authorship or date the article; why is this source considered reliable?
 * Ref 12, the news article looks credible, but the source seems a bit odd to meet our standards. The front page of the website Starswelove.com appears to be that of some spam linker.
 * Ref 17 is a primary source advert/brochure.
 * Refs 14, 18, 19, 40 are to imdb; while some referencing like this is acceptable, there are just too many statements referenced to imdb.
 * Ref 23, referencing six reviews on RottenTomatoes seems quite odd.
 * Ref 29, fansite -- not reliable
 * Refs 30, 31 -- should do better than this.
 * Refs 37, 39, 39, product catalog refs to be avoided.
 * Ref 41, not a reliable source
 * Ref 42, not a reliable source
 * I would suggest that the nominator work on these referencing issues to retain GA status. The article is also in need of a copy-edit, but that would have to follow rewriting based on reliable source references. Best of luck! - Spaceman  Spiff  04:00, 9 November 2009 (UTC)


 * I knew the problems could be the references, but their statement was true and it could be the only website providing the news. Moreover, it's a Hindi film and not many sources I could get to write. World Cinema Writer (talk • contributions) 07:12, 9 November 2009 (UTC)