Wikipedia:Peer review/LCD Soundsystem discography/archive1

LCD Soundsystem discography
This peer review discussion has been closed. I've listed this article for peer review because I'd like input on how I can make this a Featured List soon.

Thanks, What a pro (talk, contribs) is on fire.  06:05, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

Comments certainly a good start. The Rambling Man (talk) 18:26, 7 March 2012 (UTC)
 * "consists of 3 studio albums, 2 extended plays..." would write all these numbers as words, even eighteen and fourteen. Just makes for more elegant prose.
 * I often recommend that we link "discography" too.
 * "The band first gained attention when it released the single "Losing My Edge" on his own DFA label..." The band... his label... Who is "his" here?
 * You link stuff like "disco" but not "indie".
 * Link "certified" in the lead.
 * " stated that he just wanted to make" unless you directly quote him lose the "just".
 * Shouldn't full length be full-length in "full length album"?
 * " of the Billboard 200" normally " of the Billboard 200".
 * "spawned 3 singles" three.
 * The 2010 album final cell of the table appears to be missing.
 * Where are the two non-charting EPs referenced?
 * Where are the remix albums referenced?
 * And the heading in that table shouldn't be "EP details" should it?
 * Where are the first three singles referenced?
 * Don't mix date formats in the refs.
 * Check WP:DASH in the ref titles (e.g. ref 30)
 * . What a pro (talk, contribs) is on fire.  06:00, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

Comments from Michael Jester
 * Is there a photo that will show the other members of the band?
 * "The album was certified gold in the UK,[5] but failed to chart on the US Billboard 200.[6]" no comma needed after UK
 * Italicize 45:33
 * "LCD Soundsystem's second full-length album, Sound of Silver, was released to extremely positive reviews from critics,[8] and peaked at number 46 on the Billboard 200." No comma needed after critics.
 * A big problem here is that the tables do not fit WP:ACCESS. The tables should use !scope="row" and !scope="col", as well as other things. Take a peek at WP:DISCOG and look at their table. It doesn't have to be exactly from there.
 * Abbreviations in the certification column should be from the provider (e.g. UK should be BPI)
 * In the tables, you have wikilinks like Fin and NZ, but they should really link to Fin and NZ—the chart itself or the chart provider.
 * I'd consider removing the US Heatseekers and Internet charts, since a majority of the albums have charted on the Billboard 200
 * Live albums table: is there a need for two references to show one chart position?
 * What does NA mean in the music videos table?
 * En-dash needed for ref#9. Same ref also have a different date system than the other refs.
 * Ref #22: Official Charts Company -> Official Charts Company; no italics needed

—Michael Jester (talk &#183; contribs) 20:21, 9 March 2012 (UTC)
 * , but are the tables okay now? What a pro (talk, contribs) is on fire.  01:58, 10 March 2012 (UTC)