Wikipedia:Peer review/Legal disputes over Harry Potter/archive2

Legal disputes over Harry Potter

 * Previous peer review
 * A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style; it can be found on the automated peer review page for September 2008.
 * A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style; it can be found on the automated peer review page for September 2008.

This peer review discussion has been closed. I've listed this article for peer review because I've fixed most of the glaring errors noted in its last peer review and was wondering what was left before it could be nominated for FA.

Thanks,  Serendi pod ous  11:15, 9 September 2008 (UTC)

Thje last peer review closed on September 7, 2008. This was opened two days later. The policy is that An article that has had a peer review, or gone through the substantial review process at FAC unsuccessfully, can not be listed on WP:PR until at least two weeks after the archive of its previous review can be removed from Peer Review. See Peer review/Request removal policy, so I am archiving this. Feel free to open one in two weeks, Ruhrfisch &gt;&lt;&gt; &deg; &deg; 00:59, 12 September 2008 (UTC)