Wikipedia:Peer review/List of Detroit Red Wings award winners/archive1

List of Detroit Red Wings award winners
This peer review discussion has been closed. I've listed this article for peer review because a) I intend to nominate it for Featured List consideration and b) it is a massive list by my standards with a lot of in's, a lot of out's, and a lot of what have you's. I have done a few FL's recently so I have a general idea of what is required but I still need help with my prose and I am sure there are plenty of little things I have overlooked. Also I have never nominated a list of this size so I am wondering if the prose sections are adequate.

Thanks, Rejectwater (talk) 22:52, 10 October 2013 (UTC)

Comment from Rejectwater - many of the images are missing alt texts. I will get to this soon. Rejectwater (talk) 09:19, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Done. Rejectwater (talk) 11:33, 13 October 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for your quality improvement efforts to Wikipedia on this topic! &mdash; Cirt (talk) 00:43, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Comments by Cirt
 * 1) Please respond, below these comments, and not interspersed throughout, thanks!
 * 2) Infobox image caption - interesting info, but leaves me wondering who the guy is in the caption and what year it was that he's holding up the trophy?
 * 3) Lede/intro is indeed four paragraphs long per WP:LEAD, but lopsided sizes of the individual paragraphs. 1st is two sentences, next is huge, then final two paragraphs are okay size. This could be balanced a bit better for the lede.
 * 4) Suggest changes to Notes and References for references sect formatting. No need that way for sub sub sects. Just two upper level sects.
 * 5) Quite well cited throughout.
 * 6) Image review. I reviewed all images. All check out okay except for two. File:JimmyHowardRW.jpg is missing simple description field info on the page at Wikimedia Commons. File:Red Wings retired Banners.jpg appears to have some tag problems at Wikimedia Commons on its page there, consider fixing the "disclaimer" issue mentioned on that page.
 * 7) Consider adding maybe one or two more helpful links to See also sect.
 * 8) Think about adding in-line citations to back up the info given in the image captions. Not necessary. Maybe check prior precedent on similar FLs of this type in sports. Certainly couldn't hurt, just a thought.
 * 9) Good organizational structure overall.
 * 10) Please respond, below these comments, and not interspersed throughout, thanks!
 * 2. Updated. Let me know what you think.
 * 3. Updated lead somewhat. The information in the second paragraph is all so similar it makes sense to keep it together.
 * I have expanded and reformatted the lead in three balanced paragraphs. Rejectwater (talk) 01:28, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
 * 4. Done.
 * 5. Thank you.
 * 6. I added a description to the Howard image. The banners image uses an outdated tag.  I'm not sure it would be appropriate for me to change it as I am not the copyright holder.
 * 7. Done.
 * 8. My thought was that cites in the captions would be redundant as the information is all taken from the article.
 * 9. Thank you. Regards,  Rejectwater (talk) 00:25, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Reply: Looks much better. My only suggestion would be to ask at commons:Commons:Village pump what to do to fix the issues at File:Red Wings retired Banners.jpg. So I went ahead and asked about it, at commons:Commons:Village_pump. Good luck, &mdash; Cirt (talk) 17:30, 8 November 2013 (UTC)