Wikipedia:Peer review/List of House episodes/archive3

List of House episodes

 * Previous peer review
 * A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style; it can be found on the automated peer review page for June 2009.
 * A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style; it can be found on the automated peer review page for June 2009.

This peer review discussion has been closed. I've listed this article for peer review because i would like to get it to featured list status. i have reviewed previous peer reviews and feature list nomanations to see why it failed. i have since with others work updated and fixes what was the problems at the time. I would like to know if there is anything else that could be done or would be needed to get it to feature list status.

Thanks, Andy Chat c 12:27, 18 June 2009 (UTC)


 * The season entries should definitely have a paragraph on the plot of each season. Nergaal (talk) 02:33, 19 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Hi, I've been working on this article for a few weeks now. The sandbox is here. The only reason I haven't been able to finish is because I haven't seen the entire fifth season yet, and I am therefore unable to write a section introduction. If you would like to help out, be my guest.-- Music 26/  11  09:29, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

Comment: If the article is unfinished, it is premature to bring it to peer review. The article's talkpage is the appropriate place for discussions while the article is incomplete. Peer Review is very congested at the moment, and reviewer resources are currently stretched to the limit. Brianboulton (talk) 12:02, 30 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Fair enough but the article is consider mostly complete but there was talk on thing to do but no consesus could be made on them. So the best thing would be a indentpent reviewing the article and suggesting thing to fix it. So then other editors know that this needs to be done before it can even be nomatied for Feature List rather than go on what one or another editor might thinks needs done-- Andy ( talk  -  contrib ) 12:08, 30 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Massive source overhaul needed: http://www.housemd-guide.com is an unoffcial fansite. As such, it is not a reliable source, and cannot be used as a reference. Try using other sites, like IGN for example, instead. NW ( Talk ) 03:14, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
 * I just brought this problem up on the article's talk page (along with some other issues) since I didn't notice this peer review until just now. This article still needs work, and Music's workpage needs to be merged with the current article. I'm not sure this peer review will accomplish much as there is still a good amount of work to be done before it should be nominated for featured list anyway. LonelyMarble (talk) 15:10, 7 July 2009 (UTC)


 * please add back the diagnostics column! Nergaal (talk) 05:02, 20 July 2009 (UTC)