Wikipedia:Peer review/List of Link Light Rail stations/archive1

List of Link Light Rail stations
This peer review discussion has been closed.

I've written this list in the style of previous rapid transit station lists that have been featured, though they were promoted with standards from a few years ago. I believe that this list is close to being worthy of being featured, but there's a few issues (redlinks to future and deferred/unbuilt stations that were not given official names, a suitable map) that need to be resolved and I'd like to get a headstart on whatever overhauls I might need.  Sounder Bruce  01:18, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

Comments by MJ94

 * Link Light Rail should be bolded.
 * "Central Link, unconnected from the existing Tacoma Link line, opened from Seattle to Tukwila on July 18, 2009; an extension to the Seattle–Tacoma International Airport was opened on December 19, 2009." I would get rid of the semicolon and add a word to connect the thoughts as you see fit.
 * "All stations include works of public art as part of the STart Program, which requires one percent of station construction funds go to art installations." Is the capitalization of "STart" correct?
 * Yes, the name of the program is "STart". I've tried to remove confusion by
 * As you mentioned, the redlinks need some attention.
 * Once the names for the stations are adopted by the transit board (which is expected sometime this year), the station stubs will be created.
 * I really like the pictures you added as well. They are a nice addition.
 * Don't get too attached, since they're only placeholders with randomly-selected stations. I plan on taking my DSLR down to each station and just spend a sunny day photographing them one-by-one.
 * Otherwise, everything looks pretty good!
 * Don't get too attached, since they're only placeholders with randomly-selected stations. I plan on taking my DSLR down to each station and just spend a sunny day photographing them one-by-one.
 * Otherwise, everything looks pretty good!

It might be worth your time to check out Featured Lists just to see what some high-quality lists look like. I definitely think yours is headed in a positive direction. You may want to check out MOS:ACCESS and make sure your tables meet the guidelines described there. Let me know if you have any further questions, comments, or concerns. MJ94 (talk) 23:05, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the review! I'll look into making sure my tables are accessible.  Sounder Bruce  00:42, 28 April 2015 (UTC)