Wikipedia:Peer review/List of Nansen Refugee Award laureates/archive1

List of Nansen Refugee Award laureates


I've listed this article for peer review because, I've been working on it for some time and I think it might be a good candidate for a featured list. The FL process recommended peer review.

Thanks, (talk) 20:43, 8 December 2022 (UTC)


 * Hi, I'm investigating using GPT-4 for ChatGPT-assisted article reviews. After feeding the lede of this article for analysis (haven't figured out how to get it to read the tables yet), I asked it: "Can you suggest any information that should be added?"
 * "The current lede provides a good overview of the Nansen Refugee Award, its purpose, history, and the prize associated with it. To make it more comprehensive, consider adding the following information:
 * Mention the nomination and selection process for the award.
 * Briefly discuss some notable laureates or organizations that have received the award over the years and their contributions to the cause.
 * Include any significant changes or developments in the award's history or presentation over time, if any."
 * Let me know if that was at all useful. Esculenta (talk) 01:46, 28 March 2023 (UTC)

I just took a stab and rebuilding the table to be more efficient; certainly can be further improved. Separately, I want to note that the lead section was much more clear at the moment you requested peer review last December. The changes in the intervening months have left it muddled and riddled with editing errors. I haven’t done a careful review of intermediate versions looking for the absolute best starting point, but I’m pretty sure that if you were simply to restore the lead section from, that would be a big improvement. —jameslucas ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄  16:37, 24 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Thanks. This is awkward, because I'm slowly (took a break, was overwhelming me) trying to work through feedback received at Featured list candidates/List of Nansen Refugee Award laureates/archive1. Thanks for the table help, this is a great improvement. CT55555 (talk) 16:41, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Glad it feels like a step in the right direction.
 * One quirky point I wanted to flag: Ted Kennedy died in August 2009, so it’s probable he was awarded posthumously. Whether or not he was alive when he was shortlisted or even chosen is probably worth looking into.
 * Cheers —jameslucas ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄  11:58, 25 April 2023 (UTC)