Wikipedia:Peer review/List of Pakistani music bands/archive1

List of Pakistani music bands


I've listed this article for peer review because I think that it may meets the criteria of featured list, but first I need peer review that whether it meets the criteria or not.

Thanks, Empire AS  Talk! 02:56, 28 July 2020 (UTC)

Sorry it's taken me so long to get to this, have had a busy week. This list is quite a ways away from meeting the FL criteria. I'll try to help out as best I can.
 * Comments from zmbro
 * For starters, the lead section needs to be MUCH longer. I suggest giving a brief history of bands from Pakistan, such as who were among the first. Maybe give some info regarding how successful some of these bands are/were in comparison to bands from broader countries, like the UK or the US. Also, maybe give some examples of what kind of recognition (if any) that these bands have given to the Pakistani music scene, or if any have won any major awards at the Grammys or other major music awards ceremonies. Also everything has to be sourced by a reliable source
 * We also don't like to start lists off with "This is a list of..."
 * , I've expanded lead section but it needs further expansion.


 * The table needs to be updated per MOS:ACCESS with scope rows and scope columns (see MOS:DTAB for more info)
 * ❌, I don't know how to finish this step.


 * I've done this a few times but make sure to not add any images under the fair use license (these can only be used on one page)
 * , okay


 * I would add an image column to the table and put the images there and if none are available just put an en dash (–)
 * , I've added images in a new column but not any dash.


 * All images need alt text (see WP:ALT)
 * ✅, I've added, you may see.


 * In the list of genres, make sure ones after the first are lowercase (i.e. Alternative rock, pop rock, power pop)
 * ❌, Don't know anything about lowercase of genres.


 * I would make the table sortable, with the members and ref cols unsortable


 * All refs need to be archived
 * ❌, Don't know how to archive.


 * All refs need access dates, websites, date of publications (if applicable) and I'm not positive all of these are reliable. If these bands have official websites or if sites like AllMusic have entries on them I would use those
 * , I've added some access dates.


 * Ref 37 is a dead link
 * ✅, and changed.


 * Ref 43 and 49 aren't reliable (both YouTube)
 * ✅, and changed


 * Date formats need to be consistent
 * ✅, corrected date formats

That's all I'm finding so far. Has quite a ways to go before it meets the FL criteria but I've brought lists that were in worse shape than this to FL so it's definitely do-able. If you'd like more help I'd be happy to help. – zmbro (talk) 16:22, 8 August 2020 (UTC) , thank you. I've finished some tasks that I knew and waiting for next suggestions. Empire AS Talk! 11:39, 13 August 2020 (UTC)