Wikipedia:Peer review/List of countries by GDP (PPP) per capita/archive1

List of countries by GDP (PPP) per capita

 * A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style; it can be found on the automated peer review page for June 2008.
 * A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style; it can be found on the automated peer review page for June 2008.

This peer review discussion has been closed. I've listed this article for peer review, because I would like to know how to impore it towards featured list status.

Thanks, Meaty♠Weenies (talk) 19:36, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

Ruhrfisch comments: Interesting list. Here are some suggestions for improvement towards FLC:
 * I notice you also have List of countries by GDP (nominal) per capita up for peer review. Is there any reason these two articles cannot be merged? Why not have one big list with 13 columns? Here is what I mean:

Hope this helps. If my comments are useful, please consider peer reviewing an article, especially one at Peer review/backlog (which is how I found this article). Yours, Ruhrfisch &gt;&lt;&gt; &deg; &deg; 21:26, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Lead needs references as lists are different than articles - see WP:CITE and WP:V
 * This is one list with three sorts of data in it, not "three lists"
 * Table does not sort properly as is - for example sorting on rank gets 1, 10, 100, 101-109, 11, 110, 111 - 119, 12, 120, etc. I think you can use nts to make it sort. See List of Pennsylvania state parks for examples of this in action.
 * The Year column is not clearly explained - I think it is the year of the CIA estimate, but this needs to be made very clear.
 * Internet refs need URL, title, author if known, publisher and date accessed. cite web and other cite templates may be helpful. See WP:CITE
 * Please use my examples as just that - these are not an exhaustive list and if one example is given, please check to make sure there are not other occurrences of the same problem.