Wikipedia:Peer review/List of members of the 110th United States Congress/archive1

List of members in the 110th United States Congress
So, what do you think? I'm trying to make it featured. I've already put in about 200 edits. The House is further along than the Senate, but the Senate will be easier since there are fewer members. Just H 00:11, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
 * I'm getting the second table pushed over to the right of the screen by the maps in the middle. Is this unique to me? Trebor 02:11, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
 * I don't see that on this end. Just H 08:55, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
 * It's not doing it now, anyway. It's looking good (the downside of all the pictures is that it's taking an age to load though). Can't think of anything to suggest (except the categories suggested at the bottom); seems to be a good idea for a list, done well. Trebor 21:46, 30 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Please see automated peer review suggestions here. Thanks, APR t 15:49, 28 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Excellent list, very clear and easy to understand. However, why not put   around the senators names as you have with the congressmen, senators are qute likely to have an article on wikipedia.  I have done the first three names as an example.ncma 22:04, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Will do. I've only just started on the Senators.Just H 00:56, 31 January 2007 (UTC)