Wikipedia:Peer review/List of missing ships/archive1

List of missing ships
This peer review discussion has been closed. I've just started compiling this list for almost a month. I think I have come upon a stable format in which new entries can simply be added to the existing table structure. I also need to develop criteria for inclusion. As one can realise, this list can grow very large. Thanks, --Kvasir (talk) 17:22, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

Not sure where you want to go with this. FLC or just to make it a decent list? Unfortunately, as yet there's no concept of a Good list (although I know not why) so these comments are aimed at potential FLC. Food for thought. I hope... The Rambling Man (talk) 17:11, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Comments from
 * Get familiar with the Cite web template! The article appears very well referenced but the template is a much more elegant way to add citations.
 * "implies all hands lost." - explain this to non-experts.
 * Refs should be placed directly after punctuation, per WP:CITE.
 * Why the empty sections? Presumably you're going to fill them in?
 * "Possible or Last Known Location" - reduce caps and you really need to indicate which one for each missing ship.
 * If it was me, I'd force the table column widths to be the same so you get a consistent feel through the whole article.
 * Fix any citation needed's.
 * Nereus has no location.
 * Capelin has no citation.
 * S Aus & W Aus are empty.
 * Year for Albion?
 * Radcliff and Fleetwing and Raven need location info. As do a number of the U-boats.