Wikipedia:Peer review/List of number-one Billboard Top Latin Albums of 2000/archive1

List of number-one Billboard Top Latin Albums of 2000

 * A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style; it can be found on the automated peer review page for July 2008.
 * A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style; it can be found on the automated peer review page for July 2008.

This peer review discussion has been closed. I've listed this article for peer review because I want to receive feedback to complete this list in the most acurate way posible. Note: When I sent the list for the 1999 number-one albums to the FL reviewer they asked to choose between the rowspan or the sortable, and I choose the rowspan.

Thanks, Jaespinoza (talk) 19:13, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

Ruhrfisch comments: Very briefly, here are some suggestions for improvement. If you want more comments, please ask here. Hope this helps. If my comments are useful, please consider peer reviewing an article, especially one at Peer review/backlog (which is how I found this article). Yours, Ruhrfisch &gt;&lt;&gt; &deg; &deg; 03:40, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Nice to see how these have improved - not too much to comment on that has not been addressed already, so most of this will be nit-picky. Since Latin is capitalized in the title, should it be chart that features Latin music information? FIXED
 * Needs a copyedit too - The number-one albums of 2000, according to this chart were eleven ... could be simpler, just say There were eleven number-one albums on this chart in 2000... FIXED
 * Nationalities are generally capitalized (Colombian, Guatemalan). Why is Guatemalan not linked? Also why do some artists have nationalities given but others (Gloria Estefan) do not? FIXED
 * Watch overlinking - singer-songwriter is linked twice in the lead at least. FIXED