Wikipedia:Peer review/List of wind farm projects in Romania/archive1

List of wind farm projects in Romania

 * A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style; it can be found on the automated peer review page for July 2009.
 * A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style; it can be found on the automated peer review page for July 2009.

This peer review discussion has been closed. I've listed this article for peer review because i would like to list it as a featured list candidate and i would like to know some oppinions.

Thanks, Mario  1987  21:25, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

Finetooth comments: This is an interesting and useful list. I made some minor proofing changes, and I have a few other suggestions for improvement.

Lead
 * "As of 2008, wind power in Romania has an installed capacity of 76 megawatts (MW), up from the seven MW installed capacity in 2007." WP:NBSP says in part, "Wikipedia recommends the use of a non-breaking space (also known as a hard space) when necessary to prevent the end-of-line displacement of elements that would be awkward at the beginning of a new line... ". This applies to constructions such as 76 MW and all other similar cases in the lead. I see that you have already added nbsps to some instances in the lead but not all. You don't need to add non-breaking spaces to these constructions in the table because there they cannot become separated. So just a few places need fixing.
 * "The Romanian company Blue Investment will invest US$ 84... " - The space needs to be removed from between the $ and the digits; thus: US$84. Except for this first instance, you don't need to repeat the US part of this, just $1.65 billion, for example, will do.
 * Wikilink turbine?
 * "with a 100-metre (330 ft) hub height" - I don't see anything to link to for "hub height". I think this must mean the height of the turbine hub above the ground. Would it be helpful to add a brief explanation like that to the text?
 * "99-metre (320 ft) rotor diameters" - I think the rotor diameter must refer to the blades. Would it be helpful to briefly explain this in the text?
 * "surpassing the Maranchon Wind Farm, the current largest wind farm" - Rather than "current", it might be useful to specify "the largest wind farm as of August 2009".
 * "The technical wind potential designed for Romania... " - "of Romania" rather than "designed for Romania"?
 * "The Romanian company Blue Investment will invest US$ 84 million in a Baia, Tulcea County based 35-MW wind farm that will have... " - Suggestion: "The Romanian company Blue Investment will invest $84 million in a 35-MW wind farm in Baia, Tulcea County, that will have... ".

References
 * WP:MOSNUM says in part, "Dates in article references should all have the same format." For this reason, you should pick either yyyy-mm-dd or d-m-y and make them all the same. Since most of the ones that you have are in yyyy-mm-dd format, I'd suggest changing the other ones to conform.
 * Names of newspapers and magazines should appear in italics.
 * Citation 4 seems to be dead or malfunctioning.

I hope these suggestions prove helpful. If so, please consider reviewing another article on a topic of your choice. Finetooth (talk) 04:10, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
 * ✅ everything you specified and thanks for the suggestions. Mario  1987  12:58, 1 August 2009 (UTC)