Wikipedia:Peer review/Lockdown (2008)/archive1

This peer review discussion has been closed.

Hello!, I've been trying to get Lockdown (2008) to GA status for about a 2 months now (with alot of help from The Hybrid) and I would like to get some better feed back about the article. So tell me about any mistakes I have left or anything I can do to it to make it better. Because I would really like to get it to GA status by TNA's next PPV Victory Road (2008), which is on July 13.-- Will C  10:12, 30 June 2008 (UTC)

Reply


 * Okay, I fixed the lead problems. I didn't notice that they were screwed up since, User:The Hybrid and User:Nikki311 didn't say anything about them. I thought they were fine but I fixed them. My sources are Pro wrestling history, Pro wrestling edge, and Online World of Wrestling. Those are just results. Not a report. Just a results page.
 * Okay, Pro Wrestling Edge is not reliable, just don't source it. S R X  -- Latino Heat  14:38, 2 July 2008 (UTC)


 * I've placed a reference for the Six Sides of Steel part. Should I just remove all the references from the lead. I do have 2 other ones I can place in there. What should I do there? This is the first article I've ever done this with, trying to get it to GA is what I mean.

Background


 * I've changed the Impacts. Should they have a "!" on the end or just "Impact"?
 * Yeah, it should be Impact!-- S R X  -- Latino Heat  14:38, 2 July 2008 (UTC)


 * I've changed the Joe saying he'll retire part.


 * I've changed the part where is training.


 * I thought opponents sounded better than He fought Jobbers each week. Though Tomko and AJ weren't jobbers.
 * If they weren't jobbers than, jobbing isn't the term to describe the "opponents"-- S R X  -- Latino Heat  14:38, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Well Tomko and AJ weren't but he had one fight where he fought 3 different guys and they were jobbers. So I'm not sure what to do on that part.-- Will C  20:23, 2 July 2008 (UTC)


 * I've rewrote the part where he says he is the best and fighting AJ and Tomko.


 * In what way should they be elaborated?


 * I've fixed the Styles part.


 * I feel the Live iMPACT should be special since it is the first one in the history of the show. That seems really notable to me.
 * Yes, but it's not a special episode, for example, the first LIVE episode of SmackDown!, so what, its still SmackDown.


 * I've fixed all mentions of Booker and changed them to Booker T.


 * I feel they should all stay since the article is about the ppv. So if it is about the ppv then they should all be mentioned. I don't know what you mean by Money in the Bank. The matches aren't even in the article. I changed it though to something else. Maybe it will work.
 * Oh, my bad. Just place the qualifying matches in the prose and not in a list, they aren't needed, and a section is not needed just for those matches.


 * I've removed 4 and left 2.


 * Okay is that all with the Background? I fixed everything you said.

Event


 * Why is pre-tapes not notable? That is how the event began. That seems notable to me. I removed it though.
 * Also, per WP:PW/MOS, those are classified as segments/promos and are non notable and should not be written in the event section.-- S R X  -- Latino Heat  14:39, 2 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Removed all promos, interviews, etc-- Will C  20:49, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
 * I fixed the table.


 * The whole article has already been copyedited by User:The Hybrid and User:Nikki311.


 * I've fixed the were as follows part.


 * Why should "The" be Italicized? It is called Queen of the Cage.
 * It shouldnt, I was just highlighting the word that should go there, in the event section, it only said Queen of Cage, and not Queen of the Cage.
 * Fixed. I didn't notice it.-- Will C  20:49, 2 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Why are we removing stuff that happened at the event? What is the point of the event if it is just going to say they fought and Joe won? Promos are notable. It was bulidt to the match. I was told by Mikki311 that stuff before the match sure be added but not doing pla by play which I didn't. I said there was chain wrestling, hard hits, punches, and kicks. That isn't play by play. I placed more enfasis on the main 2 matches.


 * Per WP:PW/MOS, those segments/promos are non notable and should not be written in the event section.-- S R X  -- Latino Heat  14:39, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Removed. What about entrances? Joe and Angle entered in a MMA type entrances. Is that notable?-- Will C  20:49, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

Results


 * Fixed

Notes


 * How is not telling about the Fan Interaction okay but in WrestleMania it was okay to talk about production?
 * Because production is important, its how the event was produced, the fans have nothing to do with production.
 * But they do the fan interaction every year. I'll remove it.-- Will C  20:49, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

References


 * How do I make 2 colums?


 * I got the references from a discussion in WT:PW where LAX said they were all good. Also I have probably 10 more sites that I can use.

Re:Closing comments


 * Thanks for the advice. I've fixed everything you said. I don't think it is that bad. Just small mistakes. This is my first time at writting a article and trying to get it to GA status but I don't know what to do after the peer review though.-- Will C  11:00, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Mainly, this article needs major rewording, and more compliances to WP:PW/MOS. IMO, it's not in shape to pass it's GAN. Also to answer your question, you have to wait for the Peer Review to close, which takes about 10 days after no one writes in this PR. Then you place it on the waiting list at WP:PW for a week, then you nominate it once a week is up. But it's not ready, sorry (IMO). S R X  -- Latino Heat  14:38, 2 July 2008 (UTC)


 * After I remove the promos and segments and change a few little things. Will it be ready then?-- Will C  19:59, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
 * In response to the comments on my talk page, no, this article has a far alot of work to do. Wait for other users to give their review, im just one user with his own mindset, others may have different ideas. So just hold on ;)-- S R X  -- Latino Heat  23:39, 2 July 2008 (UTC)


 * I don't see how it has alot of work left. I have references. If I place more references in there that say the samething as my others then it would be redundant. Also it wouldn't be consistent. I've removed everything you said and fixed everything else. I've had 2 editors copyedit it. I don't see what is left. Will you please tell me what is left? I just want to get it to GA status. I don't see many others saying much about Lockdown since everyone else works on WWE stuff. This is the first time I've ever done this and I just want to learn the ins and outs.-- Will C  23:48, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
 * I can give you a tutorial on how to write PPVs. In all honesty, this article is far from becoming a GA. Would you like a tutorial? S R X  -- Latino Heat  23:54, 2 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Okay, In all honesty I hope you're wrong. I've worked really hard. It was in my sandbox for a long time. But yeah I'll take it.-- Will C  00:12, 3 July 2008 (UTC)