Wikipedia:Peer review/London Underground/archive4

London Underground
This peer review discussion has been closed. This is a former Featured Article which I'd like to see upgraded back to GA and then FA. I took a look at the automated suggestions and acted upon some of them although some are not relevant. I'd really appreciate hearing what you think is needed to make this article better.
 * Previous peer review

Thanks, Hugahoody (talk) 21:09, 12 February 2011 (UTC)

Rontombontom
Some first quick comments:
 * This will be a lot of work, but it is also the biggest deficiency to address: the sourcing should be completed, several complete paragraphs are unsourced.
 * There are several single-sentence paragraphs. Where possible, merge or expand them (see Manual of Style (layout)).
 * The styling of large numbers is inconsistent. Either write "x million" throughout, with a non-breaking space between the number and million, or write that on first occasion and "xM" everywhere else, without space and capping the M (see Manual of Style (dates and numbers)). The same applies to billions.
 * Abbreviate units (|abbr=on parameter in the convert template) in the infobox.
 * Move the Commons linkbox from the "See also" section to the "External links" section (see Manual of Style (layout)).
 * The first reference contains a Note which (1) is unsourced, (2) would be better placed in a separate Notes section (unless a passage can be found that can be quoted verbatim in a |quote= parameter of a citation). --Rontombontom (talk) 17:43, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The first reference contains a Note which (1) is unsourced, (2) would be better placed in a separate Notes section (unless a passage can be found that can be quoted verbatim in a |quote= parameter of a citation). --Rontombontom (talk) 17:43, 13 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Thanks, I've made a start. Hugahoody (talk) 20:51, 13 February 2011 (UTC)