Wikipedia:Peer review/Luigi's Mansion/archive1

Luigi's Mansion
This peer review discussion has been closed. I've listed this article for peer review because I would want to improve it and maybe some day bring it to an FA status Thanks, Pedro J.  the rookie 14:25, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) The main difference between a GA and a FA is the comprehensiveness of the article. The article needs expansion to have information about the marketing and production of the game. You can see IGN for some articles about the game.--Diaa abdelmoneim (talk) 23:23, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
 * 2) The plot has references to the game with quotes. All of the references should be removed. The plot's source is the game, you shouldn't provide references with quotes from the game.--Diaa abdelmoneim (talk) 23:23, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
 * 3) Change "audio" to "Music".--Diaa abdelmoneim (talk) 23:23, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
 * I would disagree with most of the changes proposed by Diaa abdelmoneim. For video game articles, quotes for Plot references are standard at FAC, and it's been years since I've seen one pass without them. Also, changing "Audio" to "Music"—when the section contains the voice cast—is inadvisable. I do agree, however, that the Development section could use expansion. Particularly, details about the release (which I believe was fairly major) are not covered in the article. Its design could also use some beefing up, if there's anything to add. JimmyBlackwing (talk) 07:55, 29 September 2009 (UTC)