Wikipedia:Peer review/M.U.G.E.N/archive1

M.U.G.E.N
I'm submitting this article because I believe it contains potentially POV sections namely the "warehousing" section, I have debated with the main contributer of the article and so far haven't came to a resolution, so I would like to have unbiased opinions about the article.Sonic Hog
 * Okay, here goes:
 * WP:LAUNDRY lists: It is very unnecessary to have things like "Exit - Closes the program"; these are indicative of a list that shouldn't be a list. The entire "gameplay modes" list is unnecessary because these options are all described in prose further down.
 * Yeah, not sure what I was thinking there either...I'll go ahead and rewrite/remove a lot of that.--Kung Fu Man 23:11, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
 * I've taken the liberty of removing the "reserved keys" and "Switching order in Turns mode" sections. WP:NOT a how-to.
 * Cite sources. Do research. Any major gaming sites/magazines/etc done features on Mugen? This applies to all sections.
 * The basic problem with that is outside of the mugen community itself, even in magazine such as EGM, Mugen has been touted as nothing more than some overglorified game/dream match gone wild. It's a bit difficult when the sources of the actual information tend to be the people working with the engine or the engine's own documentation.--Kung Fu Man 23:11, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Well, there is "actual" information and there is "well, what did critics think of it?", both of which are important aspects of a topic. Nifboy 04:09, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Rather than cite generic copyright FAQs, try to find sources relating directly to Mugen, rather than attempt to synthesize an argument (WP:OR).
 * I think there's a good article trying to get out of the current one, it just needs some coaxing. Nifboy 16:55, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Which is why I'm glad it's (finally) getting peer reviewed! Messatsu 05:15, 27 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Please see automated peer review suggestions here. Thanks, APR t 15:48, 28 January 2007 (UTC)


 * "Despite some controversies - modifications made on the actual engine are sometimes seen as an analogue to those made on the creations developed for it, and this is a recurrent topic of discussion among M.U.G.E.N fans (see Fork (software development))."
 * What, exactly, is this sentence trying to say? It looks like it's missing the second half of that sentence. Nifboy 06:20, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
 * I have no idea. It looks like a bad editting job, but the sentence survives its first draft even. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=M.U.G.E.N&oldid=23289092 Messatsu 07:35, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Oh, I see, it was originally part of the preceding sentence: "...Most popular MUGEN used today, despite some controversy - blah blah blah." Nifboy 12:15, 29 January 2007 (UTC)