Wikipedia:Peer review/Mail.com/archive1

Mail.com
I've listed this article for peer review because… mail.com is known as a primary source of spam. The article sounds more like an advertisement for mail.com, lacking objectivity. (I receive much spam from mail.com, but have never received a legitimate email from this domain.) I am not alone! Would like to hear if others have a similar problem, and feel this article should be HONEST, or deleted. Thanks, Prof.rick 00:52, 30 October 2007 (UTC)


 * A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for minor issues of grammar and house style. If you would find such a review helpful, please click here. Thanks, APR t 02:51, 1 November 2007 (UTC)