Wikipedia:Peer review/Metal Gear Solid (1998 video game)/archive2

Metal Gear Solid (1998 video game)

 * Previous peer review
 * A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style; it can be found on the automated peer review page for May 2008.
 * A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style; it can be found on the automated peer review page for May 2008.

This peer review discussion has been closed. Lost FA status mainly because of poor info on the reception of the game. I'm sure with a little work we can return this to FA status.

Thanks, Buc (talk) 18:13, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Since reception was the issue, here are some notes on that...you can get feedback on the rest if you like - just ask and I'll do it when I have time!
 * Dihydrogen Monoxide
 * Might as well just review it all. Buc (talk) 16:36, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Will do when I get the chance. dihydrogen monoxide (H2O) 23:25, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

dihydrogen monoxide (H2O) 10:04, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Shouldn't the metacrtic review box score be based on reviews, not votes?
 * IGN shouldn't be in italics in references (etc.) - noticed this on ref 81
 * "The game was generally well-received by the media, and was given high scores by some of the most prominent gaming critics." - this is kinda meaningless, as the reviews box and subsequent commentary should give this impression...
 * First para of reception is awkward...basically just listing scores for the first half, then you start quoting etc. It basically needs re-organisation; eg. quote IGN when you first give the score (more than just "incredible")
 * "Further criticism came from the website Adrenaline Vault" - if it's a website, it shouldn't be in italics (if it's a magazine, it should).
 * A lot more general receptive commentary is necessary for such a major game...plenty of VG FAs do this well, but basically a short paragraph like that isn't enough...
 * Can you recommend one? Buc (talk) 16:36, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Super_Smash_Bros._Brawl; currently at FAC. dihydrogen monoxide (H2O) 23:25, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Hmm that's a bit too different a game really, and it's brand new while this is about ten years old. Any exsample you could recommend? Buc (talk) 08:08, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Interesting - Bole, is this somehow related to why you added Brawl's entire reception section into MGS's reception section (without changing anything at all)? I question that action. --haha169 (talk) 05:22, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
 * "Members of GameFAQs ranked it the 8th best" - 8th best WHAT? (same with next sentences)