Wikipedia:Peer review/Microsoft Windows/archive1

Microsoft Windows

 * A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style; it can be found on the automated peer review page for May 2008.
 * A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style; it can be found on the automated peer review page for May 2008.

This peer review discussion has been closed. I've listed this article for peer review because I think it needs general review.

Thanks, Kozuch (talk) 12:21, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

Basically, cutting a short story shorter, this needs work on prose, citation, WP:MOS and is well short of WP:GA. Work out the basics and then come back to PR (one article at a time) and you never know, GA may be a breeze. Good luck. The Rambling Man (talk) 17:49, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Comments from
 * Deal with the top tag - citations needed.
 * ONE (1)! paragraph (and a short one) for the lead? Check out WP:LEAD.  I'd expect at least three, maybe four large paras here.
 * Image captions which are fragments shouldn't have periods.
 * Fair use rationale needed for ALL fair use images.
 * Deal with the [citation needed]'s. There are many.
 * "Long File Names"? This is English, not German, so remove those caps!
 * "Hybrid 16/32-bit operating systems" section unreferenced completely.
 * "64-bit operating systems" also.
 * Remove spaces between citations, per WP:CITE.
 * Avoid in-line citations as there are in the History section.
 * Timeline of releases section is unreferenced.